PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses
By A Mystery Man Writer
Description
Mulligan bypass arch group provided a more controlled and faster tooth movement when compared to active laceback ligature, mainly attributed to the arch wire material and type of force. Objective: To compare the efficiency and effectiveness of Active laceback ligatures with that of Mulligan bypass arch for the amount of retraction, tipping and rotation. Materials and Methods: 20 patients were selected for the study who required upper 1 st premolar extraction for decrowding. All patients were treated with 3M Gemini - MBT 0.022” metal brackets. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 10 patientsin each group. Group 1 was treated with active laceback ligature and group 2 with Mulligan bypass arch. Changes were measured on the cast with a digital vernier caliper. Student ‘t’test was used to determine the mean differences between the two groups for the amount of retraction, tipping and rotation. Results: Significant distal movement of Canine occurred in both the groups. Movement of canine was more in group 2 but distal tipping of canine and distopalatal rotation of the molar was more in group 1. These differences were mainly attributed to the arch wire material and type of force. Conclusion: Mulligan bypass arch group provided a more controlled and faster tooth movement when compared to active laceback ligature.
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/344c231236e0bcf6a9c7005852733c5195ede9ae/2-Figure1-1.png)
PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://image.isu.pub/231028093753-7c41d2fabd052fe2702dfe6ce2b4028e/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg)
Haematologica, Volume 105, Issue 11 by Haematologica - Issuu
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://media.springernature.com/m685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40510-021-00374-4/MediaObjects/40510_2021_374_Fig5_HTML.png)
Three-dimensional assessment of two different canine retraction techniques: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial, Progress in Orthodontics
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/nutrients/nutrients-11-02642/article_deploy/html/images/nutrients-11-02642-g001.png?1574989173)
Nutrients, Free Full-Text
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/107032405/mini_magick20231030-1-qj4xcq.png?1698661774)
PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2666430521001035-gr5.jpg)
T-loop spring vs ricketts maxillary canine retractor in canine retraction efficacy and anchorage loss control: A cone-beam computed tomography study - ScienceDirect
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2666430521001035-gr9.jpg)
T-loop spring vs ricketts maxillary canine retractor in canine retraction efficacy and anchorage loss control: A cone-beam computed tomography study - ScienceDirect
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/d950f096dfceb0159d676aae1258f26ecab14ca3/2-Figure1-1.png)
PDF] Rapid canine retraction in a Class II bialveolar protrusion case using a lingually extended distraction screw
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/93369912/mini_magick20221031-1-19recqp.png?1667208900)
PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/2d0c0272756f71a16f65b10a8290f99187bf7fae/3-Table1-1.png)
PDF] Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/1ee02eef642ffd3cb08ec059629a423f14183da5/3-Figure2-1.png)
PDF] Effects of active and passive lacebacks on antero-posterior position of maxillary first molars and central incisors.
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/1054042868416514-1628314811918_Q64/Suhani-Shetty-2.jpg)
PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses
![PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses](https://pocketdentistry.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/gr2-109.jpg)
Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion
from
per adult (price varies by group size)